top of page

Navigating Contractors’ Claims: Loss and Expense Due to Client Delays and Lack of Architects' Decisions

Introduction: In the intricate dance of construction projects, delays and disruptions can often be inevitable. However, when those delays stem from client-related issues such as slow decision-making or lack of clarity in architectural directives, it can significantly impact contractors' timelines, resources, and ultimately, their bottom line. In such scenarios, understanding the mechanisms for contractors to claim loss and expense under standard contracts becomes crucial. Let's delve into this intricate topic and explore the avenues available to contractors facing these challenges.

Understanding the Impact: Construction projects are often subject to a myriad of factors that can impede progress. Delays arising from client-side issues, such as indecision or changes in project scope, can cascade down the supply chain, affecting subcontractors and suppliers alike. These delays can lead to increased costs, including labor, materials, and extended overheads, all of which contribute to the contractor's loss and expense.

Contractual Framework: In standard construction contracts such as the FIDIC suite, NEC contracts, or JCT contracts, provisions are typically in place to address delays caused by the client or the architect. These contracts often include clauses related to variations, extensions of time, and loss and expense, providing a framework for contractors to seek compensation for additional costs incurred due to delays beyond their control.

Proving Entitlement: To successfully claim loss and expense, contractors must demonstrate entitlement under the terms of the contract. This typically involves establishing that the delay was caused by factors within the client's or architect's control, and that it led to additional costs that would not have been incurred otherwise. Detailed record-keeping, including documenting delays, correspondence, and costs, is essential to support the claim.

Notice Requirements: Most standard contracts impose strict notice requirements for contractors to notify the client or the architect of delays and associated costs. Failure to adhere to these notice provisions can jeopardize the contractor's ability to claim loss and expense. Contractors must be vigilant in complying with notice requirements, ensuring that any delays and resulting costs are promptly communicated to the relevant parties.

Negotiation and Resolution: In many cases, disputes over loss and expense claims can be resolved through negotiation or alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation or adjudication. Early engagement and open communication between the parties can often facilitate a more amicable resolution, avoiding the need for costly and time-consuming litigation.

Conclusion: Navigating contractors' claims for loss and expense due to client delays and lack of architects' decisions requires a thorough understanding of the contractual framework, diligent record-keeping, and effective communication between all parties involved. By adhering to contractual provisions, providing timely notice, and engaging in constructive dialogue, contractors can mitigate the impact of delays and seek fair compensation for additional costs incurred. Ultimately, fostering a collaborative approach to resolving disputes benefits all stakeholders and contributes to the successful delivery of construction projects


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page